首页> 外文OA文献 >Bismarck meets Beveridge on the Silk Road: coordinating funding sources to create a universal health financing system in Kyrgyzstan
【2h】

Bismarck meets Beveridge on the Silk Road: coordinating funding sources to create a universal health financing system in Kyrgyzstan

机译:s斯麦在“丝绸之路”上会见贝弗里奇:协调资金来源以在吉尔吉斯斯坦建立全民健康筹资体系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Options for health financing reform are often portrayed as a choice between general taxation (known as the Beveridge model) and social health insurance (known as the Bismarck model). Ten years of health financing reform in Kyrgyzstan, since the introduction of its compulsory health insurance fund in 1997, provide an excellent example of why it is wrong to reduce health financing policy to a choice between the Beveridge and Bismarck models. Rather than fragment the system according to the insurance status of the population, as many other low- and middle-income countries have done, the Kyrgyz reforms were guided by the objective of having a single system for the entire population. Key features include the role and gradual development of the compulsory health insurance fund as the single purchaser of health-care services for the entire population using output-based payment methods, the complete restructuring of pooling arrangements from the former decentralized budgetary structure to a single national pool, and the establishment of an explicit benefit package. Central to the process was the transformation of the role of general budget revenues – the main source of public funding for health – from directly subsidizing the supply of services to subsidizing the purchase of services on behalf of the entire population by redirecting them into the health insurance fund. Through their approach to health financing policy, and pooling in particular, the Kyrgyz health reformers demonstrated that different sources of funds can be used in an explicitly complementary manner to enable the creation of a unified, universal system.
机译:人们通常将卫生筹资改革的选择描述为一般税收(称为Beveridge模式)和社会健康保险(称为Bismarck模式)之间的选择。吉尔吉斯斯坦自1997年实行强制性健康保险基金以来,进行了十年的健康筹资改革,提供了一个很好的例子,说明为什么将健康筹资政策减少到Beveridge和Bismarck模型之间进行选择是错误的。吉尔吉斯斯坦的改革并非像许多其他低收入和中等收入国家那样根据人口的保险状况将其划分,而是以为整个人口建立单一体系的目标为指导。主要特征包括强制性医疗保险基金的作用和逐步发展,它是使用基于产出的支付方式为全体人民提供医疗服务的单一购买者,将统筹安排从以前的分散预算结构完全重组为一个国家池,并建立一个明确的福利包。该过程的核心是将一般预算收入的角色(即用于卫生的公共资金的主要来源)的作用从直接补贴服务供应转变为补贴全体人民,通过将他们重新分配到健康保险中来购买服务。基金。吉尔吉斯斯坦的卫生改革者通过他们的卫生筹资政策方法,特别是汇集资金,证明可以以明显互补的方式使用不同的资金来源,以建立一个统一的,普遍的系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号